Utility cites, rebukes state Department of Ecology for 'flawed' air pollution analysis; project demise would allow landfill to continue releasing tons of pollutants
I don't believe that "relatively small and unobjectionable projects" is a thing. But, aside from that, the concept of a long run existential threat is a difficult sell, even though I believe it is true and the preponderance of evidence supports the assertion.
Effective action requires big costs up front with tangible benefits that accrue to future generations. Deferring substantial consumption now for something in the future an act of political will by the electorate that is absent at this time, nor are most politicians willing to risk their careers to the truth.
I don't believe that "relatively small and unobjectionable projects" is a thing. But, aside from that, the concept of a long run existential threat is a difficult sell, even though I believe it is true and the preponderance of evidence supports the assertion.
Effective action requires big costs up front with tangible benefits that accrue to future generations. Deferring substantial consumption now for something in the future an act of political will by the electorate that is absent at this time, nor are most politicians willing to risk their careers to the truth.