From a voter's point of view, Kent's work history is of minor importance. His public utterances are evidence enough that he is unqualified to hold public office. In my opinion, he holds anti-democratic views in lock step with the Freedom Caucus and some even more unhinged. The idea that we should take military action in Mexico against the cartels beyond bizarre. A clear violation of international law.
I’m obviously not a supporter either,but because I alluded to these allegations are year ago I felt it was important to set the record straight and bring it up date. It’s a matter of fairness and accuracy.
From a voter's point of view, Kent's work history is of minor importance. His public utterances are evidence enough that he is unqualified to hold public office. In my opinion, he holds anti-democratic views in lock step with the Freedom Caucus and some even more unhinged. The idea that we should take military action in Mexico against the cartels beyond bizarre. A clear violation of international law.
I’m obviously not a supporter either,but because I alluded to these allegations are year ago I felt it was important to set the record straight and bring it up date. It’s a matter of fairness and accuracy.
Point taken. I agree that balance requires fairness and fairness is a requirement of investigative journalism.